Sep. 22nd, 2015

catherineldf: (Default)

Airships and Alchemy

Helen Rochester has a dream: unveiling her airship at the Paris Exposition of 1867. It’s sure to make a splash. But her interfering father wants to chaperone the journey — and she has doubts about the Italian alchemist. He has promised a revolutionary new fuel but why does he need the winged Venetian lion?


From the author of the comic Gothic novel The Mangrove Legacy and the medieval Breton Lais series, Airships & Alchemy brings you magic, mayhem, mechanicals — and beasts of various sizes!


Airships are nothing new in steampunk, but in my latest novel I tried to add a slightly more surprising angle. I imagined a world in which alchemy was not dropped in favour of chemistry alone, but continued to develop as the primary science. No longer simply in search of the philosopher’s stone, alchemists in my alternate history work on mundane tasks as well deeper occult secrets. They bring their mystical expertise to practical problems—like providing interesting fuels for airships.


Attitudes from the past linger: Helen’s father always refers disparagingly to the alchemist with whom his daughter plans to work, often calling him a mountebank. As far back as Chaucer’s time, this image of alchemists as frauds seemed to be the norm. The poet’s Canon’s Yeoman’s Tale offers up a portrait of the alchemist as con man, passing off recipes for gold that required nothing more than sleight of hand tricks.


Alessandro Maggiormente, the alchemist in my novel, is most notable for his proclivity for explosions (although to be fair, most of them are fairly small) and for his familiar, a Venetian lion named Eduardo. Because he is so accustomed to the beast, Maggiormente seldom notices the stares his familiar causes. Of course, so deeply absorbed in his work, it might be more accurate to say he notices very little that doesn’t have something to do with his alchemy.


Eduardo, however, is very hard to overlook. Imagine: a large lion would always stand out in Paris. It is not their natural location. But a Venetian lion is something extraordinary beyond a mere lion, too, for it has a pair of wings that are prone to draw gasps of amazement even after the initial reaction to finding the king of beasts prowling the Parisian pavement. While mostly ornamental—being far too small to actually cause the lion to fly, a fact Eduardo is generally loathe to admit—the idea of an airborne lion unsettles even the most hardened denizen of the City of Lights.


The addition on many occasions of a jaunty fez to the lion’s head might undercut somewhat any sense of alarm, even if it is also likely to leave many confused. Surely Parisians would appreciate his sense of style. In the novel, many people are initially frightened by the sight of Eduardo, but when they realise his nature is mostly gentle (provided one is not a pigeon, a creature for which he has no tolerance) they are inclined to accept him as they do much smaller cats.


How does he help the alchemist? Here’s a good scene to illustrate it:


“We don’t have to move,” the lion said, looking a little too pleased with himself. He stretched his wings out to their full size and then folded them back down again.

The alchemist looked at him with an eyebrow raised. “What?”

“I said, we don’t have to move anymore.”

“We did before?”

“You were thinking it.”

“True enough. So why don’t we have to do so now?”

Eduardo grinned, showing his big teeth. While the alchemist was very accustomed to this display, many were understandably intimidated by the gleaming choppers, a fact Eduardo chose to be aware of only some of the time. “I solved our problems with the concierge.”

The alchemist had a momentary image of the lion eating the poor woman, but doubtless he would be lying down to digest a meal of that size and he was looking far too alert and pleased with himself for that—which was a relief to say the least.

He was not pleased with Mme. Gabor, but he would not wish her to become Eduardo’s supper.

“How did you solve our problems?”

“I reasoned with her.” The lion looked even more smug now, shaking his mane to emphasize his pronouncement.

“How exactly did you do that? You worry me, Eduardo.”

His familiar barked with laughter, which seemed an entirely unsuitable sound for a lion to make. “What can I say? I made her an offer that she could not reasonably refuse.”

Maggiormente did not like the sound of that. “What sort of offer? Did this involve pigeons?”

“Only as an example,” Eduardo said with a small growl.


“What? She was trouble—and it was only likely to get worse. You need to work. I need to eat. It’s a fairly simple equation.” The lion coughed and a couple of pigeon feathers wafted out of his mouth onto the floor.

Maggiormente considered the situation. “Well, I suppose anything is worth not having to move again.”

Visit Kit Marlowe’s website or find her on Facebook.

Buy Airships & Alchemy on Kindle or as a paperback.


catherineldf: (Default)

I’m not going to talk about the specific book that set me on this particular topic, in part because I think focusing on one book (or movie or TV show or comic) out of many is a distraction.  It pinpoints a work that is symptomatic of the problem, but is by no means the cause of, or the entirety of the issue.  Nor is it limited to one genre, one medium or even just to queer characters – the “tragic mulatto” character probably precedes this one, boasting a long and inglorious history that goes back to the 1800s.

Early portrayals of LGBT characters tended to go all evil, all the time and therefore deserving of their (inevitable) ends, with rare exceptions like Carmilla. As with the tragic mulatto narrative, the butch woman or fay man burdened with unnatural samesex desire was unable to find a place for themselves in society and had to come to a bad end. Insanity, suicide, death – these were the cautionary tales. Don’t follow up on that crush, or this will happen to you too! See any pulp era novel featuring a queer character for examples.

Sympathetic portrayals are a more recent phenomenon, but often cover a lot of the same territory. Doomed gay character dies protecting straight friends. Doomed lesbian lover dies to motivate protagonist. Doomed lesbian/gay/queer couple dies to elicit reader/watcher sympathy. Lovers are torn asunder by societal pressures and forced to renounce their true loves. Queer character can never find love because they are the Only Ones of Their Kind in the Entire Universe. Really. Some fairly recent  examples of these narratives:  Lackey’s Magic’s Pawn, Tara in Buffy, Marvel’s Freedom Ring, Kiss of the Spider Woman, Tara in True Blood, the gay couple in Dracula (2013), Torchwood, Sara Lance in Arrow, virtually any movie in which the protagonist contracts HIV…and so on. The shortened version of this is that any person looking for depictions, positive or negative, of LGBTQ characters in science fiction may have easily seen hundreds, if not thousands, of these narratives. Short fiction and themed anthologies can provide a welcome respite, but again, you have to know that they’re there.

Can you do a good job of killing of a queer character? In my opinion, yes. Two books that I’ve enjoyed recently which kill off lesbian or gay or bi characters include Jackson’s City of Stairs and Priest’s Maplecroft. The deaths in question were well integrated into the plot and neither character died “because” they were queer. I do understand that other readers’ mileage may vary and that’s cool. The important thing is that we have a wide range of things to read and watch with LGBTQ characters that are readily available and which depict the rich panoply of queer life…oh, wait.

And we go downhill from here. The tragic queer narrative? Widely available. Very, very, very common. Arguably more common than positive depictions of queer characters and relationships. Books by LGBTQ authors with LGBTQ protagonists who are not tragic queers? Much less common and much harder to find. Every now and then, an out queer author makes it big despite the obstacles, which include “Queer author writes queer characters = autobiography,”  “Queer author, queer books = won’t sell, don’t bother promoting, and of course, “Queer author, queer books, don’t bother picking up for representation or publication.” But those authors  sell better if they write straight characters and they know it (see recent interviews with the likes of Emma Donoghue and Sarah Waters for examples).  Queer characters are sidekicks, at best. And once those authors stop selling those books with LGBT protagonists, they  switch to writing straight protagonists, or they disappear to the small presses or self pubbing or not writing and are promptly forgotten. Thus, we keep returning to: “There are almost no <insert identity here> characters in genre so we have to read the tragic stuff if we want anything at all!”

 What does this tell queer fans and their allies?

  • ·       We have no real place in the future
  • ·       We have no real place in fantasy worlds
  • ·       The only good queer is a dead queer (Sorry, but you know that’s there too)
  • ·       Science fiction, fantasy and horror are really big genres that include fiction, comics, movies, television and other media, but there’s not much room for us.

What does it tell heterosexual authors who want to write queer characters?

  • ·       It’ll sell better if they’re straight, but if you insist…
  • ·       Tragic queer characters are the norm and “everyone” does it
  • ·       Bumping off your queer characters really tugs at the old heart strings and impresses both heterosexual reviewers and readers

What does this do to real world queer folk?

  • ·       Big picture: contributes to depression, alienation, high suicide rates
  • ·       A tendency to avoid science fiction and fantasy as genres
  • ·       Ghettoization of genre. There are thriving m/m paranormal and lesbian fiction markets that have emerged from fanfiction over the decades, but those publishers and readers are generally only friendly to romance and some erotica. It makes sense: if all you’ve ever seen is the readily available tragic queer narrative, you think that’s all that SF/F/H has to offer. You want relatable characters that don’t die, you write your own, with the happy endings that you think you’re being denied. On the one hand, it’s great that those options are there. On the other, a lot of that sfnal work is derivative and formulaic. The depictions and ideas about gender, sexuality, world building and so forth that get developed in longer works and series and ongoing discussion in the mainstream sfnal markets don’t get much of a chance to flourish in smaller venues and knowledgeable fans looking for good queer work are stuck in the middle when they want to find work they like.

Some final thoughts: for those of you who think the tragic queer narrative du jour is original and ground-breaking, it isn’t. It may be well-written, but you’ve basically heard of it and are reading it because a big publisher gave it a huge push. A publicity push that I’ve not seen given to any equivalent queer books by queer-identified authors, or even to nontragic queer narratives by straight authors within recent memory, I might add. And that has to stop. If we want to see consistent good stories that reflect a wide range of queer experience, we have to push for them, read them, write them, promote them, watch them and recommend the ones we like. We also have to remember that there are works that paved the way, works and creators who should be remembered for what they accomplished in building this multifaceted genre as well as new voices, new creators. Let’s hear those diverse voices, see those diverse perspectives and let’s see them become just as easy to find as the tragic queers.


catherineldf: (Default)

October 2017

12345 67
89 10111213 14
15 161718192021

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 21st, 2017 03:48 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios