Corset fittings and public personas
Mar. 27th, 2010 04:29 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I went to Scoundrelle's Keep this morning to get fitted for a new ensemble. This will consist of a black silk corset, black ruffly/steampunky blouse and a black waterfall skirt with some lace trim when it is complete and I will look something like a middle-aged Victorian vampire with an excellent dressmaker. Not sure what I will end up doing with my hair but no doubt inspiration will strike when things are further along. Why I'm doing this now, after generally being a con goer/filthy pro not known for either garb or costumes, is a different story.
Some of it is that I am turning 47 on Tuesday. I've been contemplating getting an interesting outfit of a steampunky variety for awhile and I like to schedule big, flashy things around Occasions. I have also been assured that my back will be happier when corseted, which I look forward to finding out. In addition, I will also admit to vanity; I am a gal who likes her outfits and they are harder to come by when one is of a certain stature and build, particularly when one also has strong feelings about looking silly (variously defined). And I'm feeling a bit frumpy. I do not like feeling frumpy. It is bad for my self-image.
At the same time, there are interesting and prevalent opinions about Writers Who Dress Up. One school of thought is that a filthy pro must never, ever do this. The price of anything resembling is a costume is that you will immediately get taken less seriously by the numerous roving agents/editors/publishers/other writers and miscellaneous flora and fauna assumed to roam through every con. This is less of a concern for me than it might have been once. My experience is that flamboyance generally doesn't make much difference, but that may be because I am published and have begun to receive my tiny modicum of fame, rather than still trying to sell something, anything. I might also add I am aware that there are "hip and cool" fandoms to dress up in and suspect that may also make a difference in how the costumed author is perceived - steampunk good, Star Trek dubious and so forth. I have also observed that while the occasional pro may sneer, fans generally love it, especially if it looks good. And they're the ones who usually buy the books, run the cons and generally make fandom function.
There are, of course, plenty of writers who ignore the mortal terror of Being Taken Less Seriously, and wear whatever they please. In my experience, this group is often a lot of fun to hang out with. Dressing up and knowing you do it reasonably well (even if only by your own standards) is fun and often confidence-boosting. The clothes make the writer in this sense, and you can take your shy, socially-inept self out and become someone else, even for a little while. One of the beauties of fandom in its many guises is that there is such a remarkable range of things to experiment with.
Your thoughts? And yes, when it's ready, I will try and post a decent picture. :-)
Some of it is that I am turning 47 on Tuesday. I've been contemplating getting an interesting outfit of a steampunky variety for awhile and I like to schedule big, flashy things around Occasions. I have also been assured that my back will be happier when corseted, which I look forward to finding out. In addition, I will also admit to vanity; I am a gal who likes her outfits and they are harder to come by when one is of a certain stature and build, particularly when one also has strong feelings about looking silly (variously defined). And I'm feeling a bit frumpy. I do not like feeling frumpy. It is bad for my self-image.
At the same time, there are interesting and prevalent opinions about Writers Who Dress Up. One school of thought is that a filthy pro must never, ever do this. The price of anything resembling is a costume is that you will immediately get taken less seriously by the numerous roving agents/editors/publishers/other writers and miscellaneous flora and fauna assumed to roam through every con. This is less of a concern for me than it might have been once. My experience is that flamboyance generally doesn't make much difference, but that may be because I am published and have begun to receive my tiny modicum of fame, rather than still trying to sell something, anything. I might also add I am aware that there are "hip and cool" fandoms to dress up in and suspect that may also make a difference in how the costumed author is perceived - steampunk good, Star Trek dubious and so forth. I have also observed that while the occasional pro may sneer, fans generally love it, especially if it looks good. And they're the ones who usually buy the books, run the cons and generally make fandom function.
There are, of course, plenty of writers who ignore the mortal terror of Being Taken Less Seriously, and wear whatever they please. In my experience, this group is often a lot of fun to hang out with. Dressing up and knowing you do it reasonably well (even if only by your own standards) is fun and often confidence-boosting. The clothes make the writer in this sense, and you can take your shy, socially-inept self out and become someone else, even for a little while. One of the beauties of fandom in its many guises is that there is such a remarkable range of things to experiment with.
Your thoughts? And yes, when it's ready, I will try and post a decent picture. :-)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 09:35 pm (UTC)Gallifrey One is like the only con where no one gives a shit about the lines on these things, but the Whoniverse is like that. No lines. None at all.
Do I have a firm opinion on it? Not really. Do I loathe people lecturing me about it as if I'm particularly slow? Oh yes. Clothes are always costume and it's annoying to be instructed on the subject from those who don't know that.
I think your ensemble sounds fine.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 10:10 pm (UTC)After a zillion years of convention going, I've come to the conclusion that one's warddrobe is probably of most interest to oneself and that it really doesn't make that big of a difference. Though I admit that I might not wear the new ensemble at something like World Fantasy where I know I'd get grief.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 09:37 pm (UTC)The one time I listened was when someone told me that Readercon pros never dress up, never never. Since Readercon totally ignored me as C grade anyway, I realized it doesn't matter what I do: people will have their preconceptions, so why not do what I like and have fun?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 10:20 pm (UTC)The whole pro pecking order is someone's dissertation topic waiting to happen, what between the who's published by whom, who knows who, what they're wearing and so forth. At a certain point, feeling good and having fun is more worthwhile.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 11:07 pm (UTC)And if someone give me a line about professionals not dressing up, I'll just tell them "This is my professional image."
no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 08:26 pm (UTC)Hey, we should all be on a writing panel and be in costume. That'll teach em!
Veronica
no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 10:24 pm (UTC)Seeing as CONvergence is a costume-heavy con anyway, this sounds like it will come off splendidly. I always love the notion that every single con is like Readercon or World Fantasy - chock full of people who will make or break one's career based, not on your work or behavior, but whether or not you're wearing a costume or anything like it. I must admit that any publishing professional willing to snub my based on my attire, seems not worth my time.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 11:54 pm (UTC)Normally, I don't do costuming when on the panel participants' list. And, yes, part of that *is* a matter of pro-think. However, there are exceptions. If I have a Musketeer demo immediately before or after a panel, I will be in my fencing finest for the panel. (Also sweat, if it's an after the demo panel and I haven't had time to grab a quick shower.) Likewise for any panel immediately before or after a scheduled performance. If MCing the Masquerade, working an SCA demo, or hosting a costume ball, I'll likely be in appropriate costume. I consider all of those ways to indulge my love of doing costuming and not going too far beyond dressing "pro."
no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 12:37 am (UTC)Anyway. I think I fall into the camp of wearing whatever I please.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 03:59 am (UTC)Part of my "charm" -- read: part of why publishers have liked me just the way I am -- is that I'm somewhat memorable in my own individual style. Being old (60), fat (and fabulous), in a wheelchair (paraplegic for the last 19 years and they don't call me "Hell on Wheels" for nothing) may have something to do with it, but I've also been an entertainer since I was three. It sells books.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 05:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 10:32 pm (UTC)The fact of the matter is that we're talking cons, not boardrooms. Anyone who's taking fandom that seriously probably needs to develop some perspective. :-(
no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 01:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 02:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 11:13 pm (UTC)Sorry to hear that you won't be there. Since it's less than a 2-hour drive for me, I've decided to give Gaylaxicon another chance. I was very disappointed in it when Megan and I attended in 2006, but we didn't know anyone and social butterflies we were not. I suspect that now that I've attended two cons on my own (last year's WisCon and WorldCon), this will be a completely different experience for me.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 08:23 pm (UTC)I agree that Steampunk is probably dandy or anything of that ilk. Dressing up as Spock, on the other hand, might be harder to pull off. Still, showing a bit of cleavage is always a goodly and useful thing, I've found.
Can't wait to see your outfit!!!!!! I agree. Frumpy is BAD. I have this mortal terror of ending up frumpy someday. Being the strange old lady around town is more my goal.
Personally, I'll either wear a costume at a con or dress up as funky-cool-sexy as possible...which is a sort of costume, anyway.
Veronica (who also likes the Victorian look)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-28 10:44 pm (UTC)CONvergence is a costume-heavy con, of course, so that makes some difference. But yeah, the writers in attendance, not so much on the clothes. Sounds like Mike and I will be joining you this year though. :-)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 05:52 pm (UTC)It's a perk.
If anyone gives you any trouble, just unleash a Lovecraftian rant in their general direction. And if it's a publisher, make fun of THEIR clothes.
They should consider themselves lucky that they ran into a
verbally-abusive, and yet non-violent, non-smoking, non-alcoholic writer in the first place.
I like it when sexy vamps dress up as writers... um, I mean....
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-30 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-30 01:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 07:58 pm (UTC)